Origins of
Cultural Studies
The name
“cultural studies” derives from the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS) at the University of Birmingham, established in
1964. CCCS was founded as a postgraduate centre initially under the
directorship of Richard Hoggart (1964–1968) and later Stuart Hall (1968–1979).
It is during the period of Hall’s Directorship that one can first speak of the
formation of an identifiable and distinct domain called cultural studies.
The initial focus
of CCCS was on ‘lived’ culture, with an emphasis on class cultures that chimed
with the work of Hoggart and Raymond Williams. However, this moment of
‘culturalism’ – formed from an amalgam of sociology and literary criticism –
was surpassed by the influence of structuralism, particularly as articulated
with Marxism. Here the decisive intellectual resources were drawn from Barthes,
Althusser and, most crucially, Gramsci. The key conceptual tools
were those of text, ideology and hegemony as explored through the notion of
popular culture as a site of both social control and resistance. The
substantive topics of research included the mass media, youth subcultures,
education, gender, race and the authoritarian state.
In 1972, the
Centre published the first issue of Working Papers in Cultural Studies with the specific aim “to define and occupy a space”
and “to put cultural studies on the intellectual map”. Since then, the work
done at the Centre has acquired a mythological status in the field. The works
of Richard
Hoggart (b. 1918), Raymond Williams (1921–88), E.P. Thompson (1924–93) and Stuart Hall (b. 1932), all of whom were associated with CCCS at
various times, are regarded as the foundational texts of cultural studies.
Their focus was on how culture is practised and how culture is made – or how cultural
practice leads different groups and classes to struggle for cultural domination.
Since the moment
of CCCS cultural studies has acquired a multitude of institutional bases on a
global scale. Further, the influence of poststructuralism has eclipsed
structuralist Marxism as the decisive theoretical paradigm. In 1988, CCCS ceased
being a postgraduate research centre and became a university department that
included undergraduate teaching before it too was closed in the 1990s.
Richard Hoggart
Richard Hoggart started his academic career as an
adult education tutor at the University of Hull. As professor of English
literature at Birmingham University, he founded the Centre for Contemporary
Cultural Studies. His book The Uses of Literacy (1957) gave cultural studies its first identifiable, intellectual shape.
Basing his work on F.R. Leavis’s (1895–1978) ideas on literary criticism, Hoggart
argued that a critical reading of art could reveal “the felt quality of life”
of a society. Only art could recreate life in all its rich complexity and
diversity.
Raymond Williams
Raymond Williams also started his academic career as
an adult education tutor – he taught at Oxford University from 1946 to 1960.
His books Culture
and Society (1958) and The Long Revolution (1961) draw on two traditions within Marxism. For
Williams, culture is an all-inclusive entity, a “whole way of life, material,
intellectual and spiritual”. He traces the evolution of culture through its
various historical conditions towards a “complete” form. Williams sees the
emergence of a “general human culture” in specific societies where it is shaped
by local and temporary systems. Williams goes beyond literary and philosophical
analysis to examine language in all the forms in which it has been used to give
meaning to lived experience. There is no such thing as the masses, Williams
argues, only ways of seeing people as masses. We can have good as well as bad
mass culture.
E.P. Thompson
A dedicated peace campaigner and Vice-President of the
Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), E.P. Thompson was a radical historian
who changed the perception of British history. In his seminal work, The Making of the English
Working Class (1978), he sought
to demonstrate the coming-into-being of the English working class in a specific
historical period and thereby to recover the agency, concerns and experience of
the mass of the English population ignored by the dominant tradition of
conventional history. The possible developments of cultural studies that lead
from Thompson’s work are considerable. Popular mass culture is not a new
creation of consumer society – it has history. Moreover, Thompson’s distinction between a culture made for the working class, rather than by the working class, is important.
Stuart Hall
Stuart Hall, sociologist and critic, is perhaps the
most canonized of the founding fathers. Indeed, as one critic has noted,
cultural studies has tended falsely to unify itself around a small number of
highly problematic articles by Stuart Hall. He was born in Jamaica (“early
1930s”) into a middle class and conservative family. In 1951, Hall won a
scholarship to Oxford – and the rest, as they say, is (cultural) history.
In the 1950s, Hall was a leading light of the New
Left; in the 1960s and 70s, he was at the Centre for Contemporary Cultural
Studies, Birmingham; in the 1980s, he moved to the Open University and led the
“New Times” debate at Marxism
Today.
Characteristics of Cultural Studies
The history of cultural studies has provided it with certain
distinguishable characteristics that can often be identified in terms of what cultural
studies aims to do.
1. Cultural studies aims to examine its subject matter in terms of cultural practices
and their relation
to power. Its
constant goal is to expose power relationships and examine how these
relationships influence and shape cultural practices.
2. Cultural studies is not simply the study of culture as though it was
a discrete entity divorced from its social or political context. Its objective
is to understand culture in all its complex forms and to analyse the social and
political context within which it manifests itself.
3. Culture in cultural studies always performs two functions: it is both
the object of study and the location of political
criticism and action. Cultural studies aims to be both an intellectual and a
pragmatic enterprise.
4. Cultural studies attempts to expose and reconcile the division of knowledge, to overcome the
split between tacit (that is, intuitive knowledge based on local cultures) and
objective (so-called universal) forms of knowledge. It assumes a common
identity and common interest between the knower and the known, between the
observer and what is being observed.
5. Cultural studies is committed to a moral evaluation of modern society
and to a radical line of political action. The tradition of cultural studies is not one of value-free
scholarship but one committed to social reconstruction by critical political
involvement. Thus, cultural studies aims to understand and change the structures of
dominance everywhere, but in industrial capitalist societies in particular.
Comments
Post a Comment