Cultural Studies: Two Paradigms by Stuart Hall (UGC NET English Unit VII)
Stuart Hall: Brief Overview
ü Born on 3 Feb 1932 in Kingston,
Jamaica (then a colony of UK) into a middle class family of Indian,
African & British descent- Caribbean
ü A Cultural Theorist/ Sociologist
ü Lived and worked in UK since 1951
ü Studied at Merton College, University of Oxford
ü One of the founding figures of British Cultural Studies/ The
Birmingham School of Cultural Studies
ü Served as the Director of CCCS (Centre for Contemporary Cultural
Studies) at Birmingham University from
1968 to 1979
ü Professor of Sociology at the
Open University (1979- 1997)
ü Now, a Professor Emeritus
ü Married to Catherine Hall, a Feminist Professor at University
College, London
ü Founding editor of NEW LEFT REVIEW
ü Major Works
§ Situating Marx: Evaluations & Departures (1972) – article
§ Encoding & Decoding in the Television Discourse (1973)- article
§ The Hard Road to Renewal (1988)
§ Formations of Modernity (1992)
§ Questions of Cultural
Identity (1996)
§ Cultural Representations
and Signifying Practices (1997)
ü His works center on the interconnections between ideology, identity,
culture and politics- Increased concern with postmodernism and issues of race
during 1990’s- throughout his academic years, he has argued for ‘the relevance
of sophisticated Marxism to the understanding of contemporary social formations
as well as a force for social change’.
ü Founding Editor of Soundings:
A Journal of Politics and Culture
ü A proponent of Reception Theory- This approach to textual analysis
focuses on the scope for negotiation and opposition on the part of the audience
CULTURAL STUDIES: TWO PARADIGMS
(Paradigm- approaches to the study of culture/ model)
§ In “Cultural Studies: Two
Paradigms”, Stuart Hall articulates two paradigms or two types of approaches to
the study of culture. They comprise a ‘culturalist’ strand deriving from the
works of Hoggart, Raymond Williams and E P Thompson & a ‘structuralist’
strand which owed first to Levi- Strauss and Ferdinand de Saussure and then to
the work of Althusser.
The
culturalist strand in CS is interrupted by the arrival on the intellectual
scene of the ‘Structuralisms’…
Stuart
Hall presents the differences between the two paradigms on the basis of the
concept of the process/ purpose of culture, the importance of ‘experience’, the
positioning of abstractions like the existence of dialectical relations between
conditions & consciousness, and the function of ideology.
1. CULTURALISM (HOGGART, WILLIAMS & THOMPSON)
ü The founding fathers of CCCS- Richard Hoggart, Raymond Williams
& E P Thompson- represent the moment of culturalism
Hoggart’s The Uses of Literacy, Raymond Williams’ Culture and Society, E P Thompson’s The Making of the English Working Class are the seminal works in
culturalism.
The
Uses of Literacy represents a tradition of English
working class culture.
Culture
and Society presents the culture- and- society
tradition of a particular group of English intellectuals. The Making of the English Working Class presents
a tradition of working- class political
culture
Hall has characterized these authors as
‘culturalists’. He analyzed the projects of these 3 authors as acts of
‘recovery’ and of constituting traditions.
ü According to Hall, the significance of the “culturalist paradigm” is
that it insists on an understanding of culture not as a set of privileged
texts, but rather as the systems of meanings embodied in all social practices.
ü In Culturalism, experience is the ground/ terrain of ‘the lived’. Its
focus is on how people experience their conditions of life.
ü The ‘culturalists’ (Williams & Thompson) view popular culture as
an expression of the working class / expressions of class relations.
ü Hall describes Culturalists’ definition of culture as “the sum of
the available descriptions through which societies make sense of and reflect
their common experiences”. This definition has ‘democratized’ culture from an
elite status. i.e, from the ‘best’ or ‘privileged’ to a framework that involves
the common or ordinary.
ü As per the culturalist definition, ‘culture is everything’; All
things such as art, commodity, ideas, process etc created by community
(everyone regardless of status) possess the ability to define and redefine
meaning. This approach opens up all cultural phenomena to criticism. This
dissolves the traditional modernist definition of high/ low culture.
2. STRUCTURALISM (LEVI STRAUSS, SAUSSURE & ALTHUSSER)
ü The strength of Structuralist
paradigm is that it critiques the humanism and experimentalism of the
culturalist paradigm.
ü Structuralism insists that ‘experience’ can’t be the ground of
analysis. It is not an authenticating source. One can only ‘live’ and
experience one’s conditions in &
through the categories, classifications and frameworks of the culture. These
categories do not arise from or in experience.
Experience is the effect or product of classifications, frameworks,
language or discourses (social structures).
ü The Marxist Structuralists see popular culture as imposed set of
meaning.
ü To the structuralists, the study of culture is not in the sum of
cultural phenomena, but in the underlying relationships/ contradictions.
ü The term ‘structural’ gives the idea of culture as rigid and
determinative.
ü In this arena, questions of ideology, structures of domination &
the work of intellectuals take over from questions about culture or experience.
ü Structuralists stress on ‘determinate conditions’.
CULTURALISM & STRUCTURALISM
Culturalism stresses the
ordinariness of culture and the active, creative capacity of people to
construct shared meaningful practices. Empirical work, which is emphasized
within the culturalist tradition, explores the way that active human beings
create cultural meanings. There is a focus on lived experience and the adoption
of a broadly anthropological definition of culture which describes it as an
everyday lived process not confined to ‘high’ art.
Culturalism, particularly
for Williams and Thompson, is a form of historical cultural materialism which
traces the unfolding of meaning over time, exploring culture in the context of
its material conditions of production and reception.
If
culturalism takes meaning to be its central category and casts it as the product
of active human agents, structuralism speaks instead of signifying practices
which generate meaning as an outcome of structures or predictable regularities
which lie outside of any given person. Structuralism is anti- humanist in its
decentering of human agents from the heart of inquiry, favoring a form of
analysis in which phenomena have meaning only in relation to other phenomena
within a systematic structure of which no particular person is the source. A
structuralist understanding of culture is concerned with the systems of
relations of an underlying structure.
§ According to Hall, CS emerged as a distinct
problematic through the interventions in literary studies of Hoggart &
Williams. The Structuralist intervention constituted a powerful challenge to
this paradigm, making work along similar lines possible.
§ Hall is of the view that they are contesting
paradigms & they are a part of a historical narrative of the emergence and
development of Cultural Studies. i.e, CS is constituted by opposing theoretical
discourses, which are both necessary but limited. To him, some kind of
conceptual transformation or epistemological break is necessary.
§ Hall concludes that there are two major and as
yet unreconciled paradigms for the analysis of popular culture (culturalism
& structuralism). He argues that culturalism’s strength corresponds to the
weakness of structuralism. Structuralism is unable to explain those phenomena
which culturalism privileges.
§ Hall attempts to chart a course for the future of CS. To him, one can ‘appropriate’ the strength and avoid the weakness of each approach, which will go beyond both paradigms.
Comments
Post a Comment