Wole Soyinka’s Theatre: the “Fourth Stage”
The “Fourth Stage” is uniquely
Soyinka’s interpretation of Yoruba mythology in which there are four parallel
worlds of the living, the dead, the unborn and the chthonic (underworld) realm,
where the ambiguities of cultural identities are contested. These worlds exist
in a non-hierarchical manner, and their membranous nature allows the dwellers
to access these different worlds at will. This interpretation is the central
thesis of Soyinka in his essays, “Morality and Aesthetics in the Ritual
Archetype”, “Drama and the African Worldview” and “The Fourth Stage”. The main
argument is that African myth and ritual (exemplary in Yoruba mythology) are
not discrete background cultural objects but form the continuing aesthetic and
social foregrounding of African society.
By starting off with
Nietzsche’s theory of the ritual roots of classical Greek theatre, Soyinka
explains the roots of African (Yoruba) ritual tragedy in the myth of Ogun and
the sacral rites depicting his prowess in battle and metallurgy. For Nietzsche,
Dionysius and Apollo are actually art “states” or affects. Dionysius is the
“state” of wild dreams and Apollo is the “state” of rational contemplation.
Soyinka envisions Nietzsche's parallels in the mythic rituals associated with
Ogun and Obatala, two central Yoruba divinities.
For Soyinka, Ogun is “coarse”
and creative, but Obatala is calm and contemplative. Soyinka argues that these
neat categories conceal a lot of complexities. Obatala’s contemplative essence
conceals his radical force as “creator”. And Ogun can be rational and
irrational, creative and destructive. In general, it is possible to read
Soyinka’s plays or even stage them as illustrating this binary of Ogun/Obatala.
On the other hand, Soyinka challenges mimesis, and mystifies the boundaries between
art and life further by invoking a “fourth stage” which in his view is
accounted for in Yoruba mythology: “It is the chthonic realm, the area of the
really dark forces, the really dark spirits, and it also is the area of stress
of the human will”.
Interpreting Soyinka’s “fourth
stage” as a performance prototype suggests that the actor can either be the
virtual mime (or imitation) of the deity, or a mouthpiece (or representation)
of the deity he is playing; or, a cross between both possibilities. Although
Soyinka offers the fourth stage as “the vortex of archetypes and home of the
tragic spirit” (Soyinka, 1976:149), he does not stage these archetypes (for
instance, Ogun, Obatala, Sango, etc.) in his plays as characters in their own
right, they are mostly discernible as psychological essences or social
references in the urban legends that Soyinka creates in his plays.
Comments
Post a Comment