Racism in Nadine Gordimer’s "Burger’s Daughter"
Burger’s
Daughter (1979) is a story about Rosemarie Burger
and her politically involved family. Her father Lionel Burger, was a political
activist in the South African Communist Party, together with his wife Cathy
Burger. Lionel Burger uttered these words at his trial: ‘‘I took up then the
pursuit of the end to racialism and injustice that I have continued and shall
continue as long as I live’’. He was against the oppression of the blacks
and any form of injustice against them.
The first example of racial melancholy is portrayed in Burger’s Daughter by the following statement, ‘‘A thousand black and white people had come to the funeral of Cathy Burger, his wife, and Rosa’s mother, some years before’’. People from all walks of life came to Rosa’s mother’s funeral. This was a true sign of someone who had worked across racial lines. They came to bid farewell to a political stalwart. Her work for the Communist party and for the previously disadvantaged people of South Africa was evident in the number and kind of people who attended her funeral. At the trial of Lionel Burger, some stalwarts of the liberation struggle from both races made a nostalgic appearance: ‘‘Two or three men and women who had been hidden away by house arrest for many years appeared on the platform like actors making a come-back with the style and rhetoric of their time’’ . Stalwarts of the liberation are compared to actors making a come-back, and their look and style epitomizes their time.
Another portrayal of racial melancholy in Burger’s
Daughter is shown in terms of the ownership of
land: ‘‘The children of the white people would not make it in
their white suburb and would not inherit the house bought on the municipal loan
available to whites, or slot safely into jobs reserved for whites against black
competition’’.
At independence, things in South Africa
became difficult for the white people; they had to apply for loans in the
normal way like the majority, the oppressed black people. In terms of employment,
the minority had to go through interviews like everyone else. They were not
just appointed in posts that used to be exclusively reserved for them.
In the novel Burger’s Daughter,
Rosa’s parents were not the typical white couple who hated black people,
because they wanted racial equality. Their
outlook on life is expressed in the following quote: “Being white
constitutes a counter-definition whose existence my father and mother were
already arguing between dancing to the gramophone at the workers’ club”. The Burger couple wanted to dance to the
gramophone at the employees’ club without being accused of doing wrong. Being
white, according to Rosa’s parents, was raging within them. They were not at a
loss entirely on their point of departure, because they chose to fight what was
right in their eyes, taking a bold decision that will change their lives
forever.
The fight for the liberation struggle was to be achieved by the
majority blacks, but also with the help of a small group of white revolutionaries.
However, this select group of white people had to make a clear distinction
between class and black consciousness, so that they were not blinded or lose
focus on the ultimate prize. This duality is portrayed by who should lead or be
at the forefront of the struggle. As the novelist writes : “The future he
was living for until the day he died can be achieved only by black people with
the involvement of the small group of white revolutionaries who have solved the
contradiction between black and class consciousness, and qualify to make
unconditional common cause with the struggle for full liberation, e.g., a
national and social revolution.”
Rosa’s childhood friend, Baasie, suffered an internal conflict regarding the depiction of Lionel Burger. Baasie (“little boss”) was
not happy with what Rosa was telling people at the gathering in Europe. He did
not like the attention that Lionel Burger was receiving, and the way he was
being portrayed as a martyr. He believed that the blacks who fought for the
liberation of the country should also be held in high esteem like Lionel
Burger. They also suffered, and some were still in prison for their role: “Listen,
there are dozens of our fathers sick and dying like dogs, kicked out of the
locations when they can’t work anymore. Getting old and dying in prison. I know
plenty blacks like Burger. It’s nothing, it’s us, we must be used to it, and
it’s not going to show on English television.”
After she spoke to Baasie, Rosa did a lot of soul-searching. After the heated talk with Baasie, Rosa started to question herself about her identity. She started questioning her role in all the political turmoil that the country of her birth was in. It was a very important time of her life. She wanted to know where she belonged and what was going on around her and the world at large: “Now you are free……… Tony is dead and there is no other child but me, for her. Two hundred and seventeen days with the paisley scarf in my pocket, while the witness came in and out the dock condemning my father. My mother is dead and there is only me, there, for him. Only me. My studies, my work, my love affairs must fit in with the twice monthly visits to the prison, for life, as long as he lives-if he had lived.”
In the novel Burger’s Daughter, the
blacks’ inadequacies are shown through the type
of work they did and their dress code: ‘‘Real
espresso was brought to a little iron table by a black waiter dressed up in
stripped trousers, black waistcoat and cheese-cutter’’. The waiters must
wear a uniform that was provided by the owners, and they have to serve real
espresso to the white customers. The fact that they, the indigenous people are
the ones serving the customers is a deliberate racist act by the owners who are
white.
The critical race theory is essential in
this regard, as it deals with white supremacist’s ideals. The white person thinks he/she is superior to the black person
and can control this marginalised group. The black person is exploited, and
this is evident in the dress code of the waiter. The blacks were considered as
obedient individuals who did what their masters wanted them to do. This is
illustrated in the quote from Burger’s Daughter: ‘‘They’d have a
black if it was allowed to have blacks living in, because you can control a
black, he’s got to listen to you’’. A typical Afrikaner man controlled the
black person through manipulation, money and employment so that they could be
their slaves forever. This shows that racism was used to control most of the
indigenous inhabitants to the benefit of the elite.
The difference between the people in a racist society are apparent in Burger’s Daughter.
The differences are shown in the physical appearance of the groups. Division
and contrast were essential to the dispensation of that time, and this is shown
in the statement: ‘‘In the church to which my aunt drove us on Sunday
morning, children clean and pretty, we sat among the white neighbours from
farms round about and from the dorp.’’
A further illustration of the appearance
of the oppressed is portrayed when the waiter “would be in his place down
under the trees out of sight of the farmhouses, where black people sang hymns
and beat old oil drums, or in the tin church in the dorp location.’’ Thus, racial segregation is illustrated by the black waiter
who attends church faraway, in a place that is designated for black people.
This example confirms that the blacks were racially discriminated against by
their masters, as they were not granted the same privileges.
In Burger’s Daughter, black people are portrayed as vulnerable and struggling
to make ends meet. The first example that shows the destitute and plight of the
black person is represented in the following manner: “Black women selling
mealies sat with babies crawling from under the coloured towels they wore as
shawls……. Black children coming up behind humble parents were in rags or
running barefoot, bundled from above the knees in school uniforms that could be
afforded only once in years…”
The vulnerability of black people is
further illustrated in the following quotation: “All this ordered life
surrounded, coated, swaddled Rosa; the order of Saturday, the order of family
hierarchy, the order of black people out in the street and white people in the
shade of the hotel stoep.” While the white people enjoy the protection of
the shade of the hotel and are advantaged, the black
people remain destitute. The social hierarchy positions black people out
in the streets, in the sun, where society has put them. According to the white
men at the hotel, there is no place for the black waiter among them.
In Burger’s Daughter, racial issues
are also shown through the symbolic use of the swimming
pool, which was a luxury for black people. Some old black people were
only then learning how to swim. On the contrary, the white girl, Rosa, was
taught how to swim when she was a small child. “The swimming-pool remained
to give pleasure to other people, black children who had never been into a pool
before could be taught to swim there by my father.” The racial truth of
lack of resources is portrayed in this example. Blacks cannot afford to have or
construct a swimming pool, so they go to a white man’s place to learn how to swim.
The unequal distribution of resources was thus
evident at the time.
White people regarded the blacks as errand boys and street sweepers. They were
insignificant people who added no value to life. This is portrayed in the novel
in the following: “If the white people in the shop saw only errand boys and
tea-girls and street sweepers instead of black people, now they saw Marisa.”
The blacks buy
stale bread while the fresh bread is reserved for the elite and the
white customers. Even when the whites are buying fruit, they are given the
freshest fruit but the blacks are given the half rotten fruit. The following
quote depicts this unfairness: ‘‘When I go to the café to buy bread, they
give the kaffir yesterday’s stale. When he goes for fruit, the kaffir gets the
half-rotten stuff the whites won’t buy. That is black.’’
In the novel Burger’s Daughter, racial segregation and acceptance is evident when Gordimer
writes: “The white workers belong to the exploiting class, and they take
part in the suppression of the blacks. The black man is not fighting for
equality with whites. Blackness is the black man refusing to believe the white
man’s way of life is the best for blacks.” The argument of what is best for
the native surfaces in this heated discussion of friends from different races.
According to the black political activists, the white man’s way of doing things
is not the best for the natives, as the two races are different. The
suppression of the natives is compounded by the white workers who exploit their
black counterparts at any given moment. They do this through racial
discrimination, wages, and in terms of movement.
Comments
Post a Comment